<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Books about Hell &amp; Resurrection</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.chuckp3.com/2009/09/the-last-wordsurprised-by-hope/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.chuckp3.com/2009/09/the-last-wordsurprised-by-hope/</link>
	<description>thinking out loud about life, art and imitating Jesus</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 11 Jul 2010 00:57:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://www.chuckp3.com/2009/09/the-last-wordsurprised-by-hope/#comment-5156</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 12:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.chuckp3.com/?p=694#comment-5156</guid>
		<description>I wonder if McClaren is just being consistent in matching form with content. If you&#039;re basic idea of theology is in narrative form, then what better way to communicate it than through a narrative? Also, by nature of having individuated characters who can respond and react to theological propositions, he provides a good model for theological dialogue, too. (In other words, kudos to B-Mac!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder if McClaren is just being consistent in matching form with content. If you&#8217;re basic idea of theology is in narrative form, then what better way to communicate it than through a narrative? Also, by nature of having individuated characters who can respond and react to theological propositions, he provides a good model for theological dialogue, too. (In other words, kudos to B-Mac!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
