Comments on: Seriously? http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/ thinking out loud about life, art and imitating Jesus Sun, 11 Jul 2010 00:57:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Charlie http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/#comment-411 Charlie Mon, 13 Nov 2006 20:08:00 +0000 http://clyonspardue.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/seriously/#comment-411 The angle isn't shifted at all, it's just cropped closer and fliped horizontally. The angle isn’t shifted at all, it’s just cropped closer and fliped horizontally.

]]> By: montague http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/#comment-410 montague Mon, 13 Nov 2006 19:51:00 +0000 http://clyonspardue.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/seriously/#comment-410 actually Stewart's is a bit different. Notice the shift in angle. That's gotta account for some creativity credit. : ) actually Stewart’s is a bit different. Notice the shift in angle. That’s gotta account for some creativity credit. : )

]]> By: J.R. http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/#comment-409 J.R. Sat, 28 Oct 2006 22:29:00 +0000 http://clyonspardue.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/seriously/#comment-409 I have seen it, but I can't find it now.<br/><br/>For something as highly visable as a book cover it is a bad idea to use stock photography. I have seen it, but I can’t find it now.

For something as highly visable as a book cover it is a bad idea to use stock photography.

]]> By: daniel greeson http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/#comment-408 daniel greeson Tue, 24 Oct 2006 17:21:00 +0000 http://clyonspardue.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/seriously/#comment-408 lets pray so. lets pray so.

]]> By: Charlie http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/#comment-407 Charlie Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:15:00 +0000 http://clyonspardue.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/seriously/#comment-407 I don't. I even tried to find the Stock Photo but didn't come across it. Maybe it got pulled for being overused. I don’t. I even tried to find the Stock Photo but didn’t come across it. Maybe it got pulled for being overused.

]]> By: Mike http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/#comment-406 Mike Mon, 23 Oct 2006 02:10:00 +0000 http://clyonspardue.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/seriously/#comment-406 does anyone know what that shot is from? does anyone know what that shot is from?

]]> By: Charlie http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/#comment-405 Charlie Sun, 22 Oct 2006 21:04:00 +0000 http://clyonspardue.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/seriously/#comment-405 I liked Gorman's book as well, that's why I noticed the same photo on the others. I liked Gorman’s book as well, that’s why I noticed the same photo on the others.

]]> By: daniel greeson http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/#comment-404 daniel greeson Sun, 22 Oct 2006 19:48:00 +0000 http://clyonspardue.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/seriously/#comment-404 ive noticed that picture before on other stuff. pretty stupid.<br/>i think the picture stays on Gorman's. which by the way is a good book. ive noticed that picture before on other stuff. pretty stupid.
i think the picture stays on Gorman’s. which by the way is a good book.

]]> By: Kara http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/#comment-403 Kara Sat, 21 Oct 2006 16:05:00 +0000 http://clyonspardue.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/seriously/#comment-403 I knew the photo from Gorman's book cover several years ago ... that's very strange. I knew the photo from Gorman’s book cover several years ago … that’s very strange.

]]> By: Rusty Brian http://www.chuckp3.com/2006/10/seriously/#comment-402 Rusty Brian Fri, 20 Oct 2006 17:09:00 +0000 http://clyonspardue.wordpress.com/2006/10/20/seriously/#comment-402 That's pretty funny. I wouldn't tell your DS though! Do you think he knows? That’s pretty funny. I wouldn’t tell your DS though! Do you think he knows?

]]>