Seriously?

10 Comments 20 October 2006

Wow… overused Stock Photos much?

Your Comments

Rusty Brian says:

October 20, 2006 at 5:09 pm

That’s pretty funny. I wouldn’t tell your DS though! Do you think he knows?
Kara says:

October 21, 2006 at 4:05 pm

I knew the photo from Gorman’s book cover several years ago … that’s very strange.
daniel greeson says:

October 22, 2006 at 7:48 pm

ive noticed that picture before on other stuff. pretty stupid.
i think the picture stays on Gorman’s. which by the way is a good book.
Charlie says:

October 22, 2006 at 9:04 pm

I liked Gorman’s book as well, that’s why I noticed the same photo on the others.
Mike says:

October 23, 2006 at 2:10 am

does anyone know what that shot is from?
Charlie says:

October 23, 2006 at 2:15 am

I don’t. I even tried to find the Stock Photo but didn’t come across it. Maybe it got pulled for being overused.
daniel greeson says:

October 24, 2006 at 5:21 pm

lets pray so.
J.R. says:

October 28, 2006 at 10:29 pm

I have seen it, but I can’t find it now.

For something as highly visable as a book cover it is a bad idea to use stock photography.
montague says:

November 13, 2006 at 7:51 pm

actually Stewart’s is a bit different. Notice the shift in angle. That’s gotta account for some creativity credit. : )
Charlie says:

November 13, 2006 at 8:08 pm

The angle isn’t shifted at all, it’s just cropped closer and fliped horizontally.

Share your view