Labels: Graphic Design
posted by Charlie at 12:03 PM
That's pretty funny. I wouldn't tell your DS though! Do you think he knows?
I knew the photo from Gorman's book cover several years ago ... that's very strange.
ive noticed that picture before on other stuff. pretty stupid.i think the picture stays on Gorman's. which by the way is a good book.
I liked Gorman's book as well, that's why I noticed the same photo on the others.
does anyone know what that shot is from?
I don't. I even tried to find the Stock Photo but didn't come across it. Maybe it got pulled for being overused.
lets pray so.
I have seen it, but I can't find it now.For something as highly visable as a book cover it is a bad idea to use stock photography.
actually Stewart's is a bit different. Notice the shift in angle. That's gotta account for some creativity credit. : )
The angle isn't shifted at all, it's just cropped closer and fliped horizontally.
Post a Comment
<< Home
10 Comments:
That's pretty funny. I wouldn't tell your DS though! Do you think he knows?
I knew the photo from Gorman's book cover several years ago ... that's very strange.
ive noticed that picture before on other stuff. pretty stupid.
i think the picture stays on Gorman's. which by the way is a good book.
I liked Gorman's book as well, that's why I noticed the same photo on the others.
does anyone know what that shot is from?
I don't. I even tried to find the Stock Photo but didn't come across it. Maybe it got pulled for being overused.
lets pray so.
I have seen it, but I can't find it now.
For something as highly visable as a book cover it is a bad idea to use stock photography.
actually Stewart's is a bit different. Notice the shift in angle. That's gotta account for some creativity credit. : )
The angle isn't shifted at all, it's just cropped closer and fliped horizontally.
Post a Comment
<< Home